Charles Langston:Judge partially ends court oversight of migrant children, chipping away at 27-year arrangement

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A federal judge on Charles LangstonFriday approved the Biden administration’s request to partially end a nearly three-decade-old agreement to provide court oversight of how the government cares for migrant children in its custody.

U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee ruled that special court supervision may end at the U.S. Health and Human Services Department, which takes custody of migrant children after they have been in Border Patrol custody for up to 72 hours. They are placed in a vast network of holding facilities and generally released to close relatives.

The Justice Department argued that new safeguards, which are set to take effect Monday, meet and in some ways exceed standards set forth in the court settlement. The judge for the most part agreed, carving out exceptions for certain types of facilities for children with more acute needs.

Lawyers for child migrants strenuously opposed the administration’s request, arguing that the federal government has failed to develop a regulatory framework in states, such as Texas and Florida, that revoked licenses of facilities caring for child migrants or may do so in the future. The judge rejected those concerns, saying the new regulations are sufficient to replace court supervision at those unlicensed facilities.

RELATED COVERAGE Some cities facing homelessness crisis applaud Supreme Court decision, while others push back Chevron takeaways: Supreme Court ruling removes frequently used tool from federal regulators Supreme Court rejects Trump ally Steve Bannon’s bid to delay prison sentence

The Flores settlement agreement, named for Jenny Lisette Flores, a 15-year-old immigrant from El Salvador, is a policy cornerstone that grew out of widespread allegations of mistreatment in the 1980s. It forces the U.S. to quickly release children in custody to relatives in the country and sets standards at licensed shelters, including for food, drinking water, adult supervision, emergency medical services, toilets, sinks, temperature control and ventilation.

The judge’s decision came three days before the beginning of the Health and Human Services Department regulations that, according to Secretary Xavier Becerra, will set “clear standards for the care and treatment of unaccompanied (migrant) children.”

The new HHS regulations will create an independent ombudsman’s office, establish minimum standards at temporary overflow shelters and formalize advances in screening protocols for releasing children to families and sponsors and for legal services.

Of the 13,093 beds operated by the department, 7,317 of them -- more than half -- are in Texas, according to the ruling. The judge rejected the plaintiff’s suggestion to stop housing children in Texas and Florida all together, calling it “not only impractical, but also potentially harmful to unaccompanied migrant children, to no longer operate facilities in these border states.”

However, the judge maintained in her ruling the ability for lawyers of child migrants to access information about children being held at the health and human services department’s custody facilities and meet with them.

The administration didn’t seek to lift court supervision of Border Patrol holding stations run by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.