Current:Home > MarketsRep. George Santos pleads not guilty to fraud charges, trial set for September 2024 -Elevate Capital Network
Rep. George Santos pleads not guilty to fraud charges, trial set for September 2024
Chainkeen Exchange View
Date:2025-04-07 12:48:29
Rep. George Santos pleaded not guilty Friday to the charges contained in a superseding indictment that accused him of stealing people’s identities, making charges on his donors’ credit cards without their authorization and lying to federal election officials.
Trial was set for Sept. 9, 2024 and is expected to last three weeks.
The 23-count superseding indictment filed earlier this month charges the New York congressman with "two counts of wire fraud, two counts of making materially false statements to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), two counts of falsifying records submitted to obstruct the FEC, two counts of aggravated identity theft and one count of access device fraud," the United States Attorney's Office in the Eastern District of New York said in a release.
Santos is keeping his lawyer, Joe Murray, despite a potential conflict of interest involving others associated with the case.
The new charges followed the indictment this month of Santos’ former campaign finance chief Nancy Marks. Prosecutors allege they enlisted 10 family members without their knowledge to donate to the campaign to make it seem like Santos was getting enough support to qualify for party funds.
According to the charges, Santos allegedly said he lent his campaign $500,000 when he only had $8,000 on hand.
There was no change in bail conditions at Friday's hearing. The next status conference is set for Dec. 12.
In May, Santos was indicted by federal prosecutors on 13 criminal counts, including seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds and two counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives. He pleaded not guilty to those charges.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- If a Sports Bra and a Tank Top Had a Baby It Would Be This Ultra-Stretchy Cami- Get 3 for $29
- Get Glowy, Fresh Skin With Skin Gym’s and Therabody’s Skincare Deals Including an $9 Jade Roller & More
- Listen to Beyoncé's two new songs, '16 Carriages' and 'Texas Hold 'Em'
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- All the times number 13 was relevant in Super Bowl 58: A Taylor Swift conspiracy theory
- More than 383,000 Frigidaire refrigerators recalled due to potential safety hazards
- The San Francisco 49ers lost Super Bowl 58. What happens to the championship shirts, hats?
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Longtime NPR ‘Morning Edition’ host Bob Edwards dies at age 76
Ranking
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Suspect captured in Memphis crime rampage that left at least 1 dead, several wounded
- Review: Justin Hartley makes a handsome network heartthrob in 'Tracker'
- North Carolina voter ID trial rescheduled again for spring in federal court
- What polling shows about Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Harris’ new running mate
- Times Square shooting: 15-year-old teen arrested after woman shot, police chase
- Wreck of ship that sank in 1940 found in Lake Superior
- Super Bowl photos: Chiefs, Taylor Swift celebrate NFL title
Recommendation
How effective is the Hyundai, Kia anti-theft software? New study offers insights.
What to know about a shooting at Joel Osteen’s megachurch in Texas during Sunday services
Shop J. Crew’s Jaw-Dropping Sale for up to 95% off With Deals Starting at Under $10
Why Taylor Swift Has Never Headlined the Super Bowl Halftime Show
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
A female stingray at a NC aquarium becomes pregnant without a male mate. But how?
What to know about a shooting at Joel Osteen’s megachurch in Texas during Sunday services
Noem fills 2 legislative seats after South Dakota Supreme Court opinion on legislator conflicts