Current:Home > NewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Elevate Capital Network
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-17 01:52:49
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (1449)
Related
- Breaking debut in Olympics raises question: Are breakers artists or athletes?
- China floods have left at least 20 dead
- America Ferrera Dressed Like Barbie Even Without Wearing Pink—Here's How You Can, Too
- Amateur baseball mascot charged with joining Capitol riot in red face paint and Trump hat
- Kehlani Responds to Hurtful Accusation She’s in a Cult
- The Mega Millions jackpot has soared to $1.25 billion. Here’s how hard it is to win
- Tech consultant to stand trial in stabbing death of Cash App founder Bob Lee
- Sydney Sweeney Wishes She Could Give Angus Cloud One More Hug In Gut-Wrenching Tribute
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- The new CDC director outlines 3 steps to rebuild trust with the public
Ranking
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Lizzo Sued By Former Dancers for Alleged Sexual Harassment and Weight-Shaming
- Glow All Summer Long With Sofia Richie Grainge’s Quick Makeup Hacks To Beat the Heat
- Lighthouse featured in ‘Forrest Gump’ goes dark after lightning strike
- The 'Rebel Ridge' trailer is here: Get an exclusive first look at Netflix movie
- Grand jury indicts man accused of shooting and killing 1 and injuring 4 at Atlanta medical practice
- Mega Millions jackpot for tonight's drawing increases to estimated $1.1 billion
- Sofía Vergara Is On Hot Pursuit to Kick Back on Florida Girls' Trip Amid Joe Manganiello Divorce
Recommendation
Elon Musk’s Daughter Vivian Calls Him “Absolutely Pathetic” and a “Serial Adulterer”
Here’s a look at some of Louisiana’s new 2023 laws
Police search for teen in fatal stabbing of NYC dancer
The new CDC director outlines 3 steps to rebuild trust with the public
The Daily Money: Disney+ wants your dollars
What is a 'fire whirl,' the rare weather phenomenon spotted in a California wildfire
China floods have left at least 20 dead
Why Jessica Chastain & Oscar Isaac's Friendship Hasn't Been the Same Since Scenes From a Marriage