Current:Home > ContactGun rights activists target new Massachusetts law with lawsuit and repeal effort -Elevate Capital Network
Gun rights activists target new Massachusetts law with lawsuit and repeal effort
View
Date:2025-04-16 18:29:31
BOSTON (AP) — No sooner had Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey signed a sweeping new firearms bill into law last month than gun rights activists filed a lawsuit challenging it, calling the measure an “historic attack on our civil rights.”
Activists are also hoping to place a question on the 2026 ballot to repeal the law, which expands the state’s already tough gun restrictions. It was enacted in part as a response to the Supreme Court’s 2022 Bruen decision declaring citizens have a right to carry firearms in public for self-defense.
The Massachusetts measure cracks down on privately made, unserialized “ghost guns,” criminalizes possessing bump stocks and trigger cranks, requires applicants for a gun license to complete live-fire training, updates the state’s tests for what makes a firearm an assault-style weapon and requires an advisory board to provide a ongoing list of prohibited weapons.
The measure also expands the state’s “red flag” law to let police as well as health care and school officials alert the courts if they believe someone with access to guns is a danger and should have their firearms taken away, at least temporarily.
People looking to suspend the law from taking effect until a potential 2026 referendum on it will need to file at least 49,716 signatures from registered voters, which will also help guarantee the question is placed on the ballot. Healey could block any temporary suspension of the law by pushing for an “emergency preamble” putting it into effect immediately.
The federal lawsuit by gun advocates argues the law is unconstitutional, characterizing it as “onerous firearms legislation that imposes sweeping arms bans, magazine restrictions, registration requirements, and licensing preconditions that are as burdensome as they are ahistorical.”
The suit — which cites the Bruen decision — asks the federal court to issue a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction barring the state from enforcing the “burdensome licensing regimes on the possession and carry of firearms for self defense.”
Jim Wallace, executive director of the Massachusetts Gun Owners Action League, a local affiliate of the National Rifle Association, said the group sued in federal court because there “is no hope for any help within the Massachusetts court system.”
He suggested the lawsuit is just the start of a wider legal effort to peel back elements of the law piece by piece, saying it’s too expansive for one court to take it on all at once.
“It’s not about crime. It’s not about accidents. It’s not about suicides,” he said. “It’s a bigoted act against 10 percent of the state’s population,” referring to gun owners.
Democratic state Rep. Michael Day, one architect of the legislation, said he’s confident it can withstand the legal challenges. He predicted voters would back the law if the choice is put on the 2026 ballot.
“We’re trying to save lives,” he said. “One of the reasons people live in Massachusetts is that they can walk down the street without someone coming up on their side and menacing them.”
Cody Jacobs, a lecturer at Boston University School of Law, said the measures that deal with increased licensing requirements aren’t excessively burdensome, don’t prevent gun ownership and don’t infringe on Second Amendment rights.
“Other training requirement for gun owners have been upheld by the courts,” he said. “I’d be pretty surprised if this would be overturned.”
The Massachusetts law prohibits people who aren’t part of law enforcement from carrying guns at schools, polling locations and government buildings. It also requires those applying for a license to carry firearms to demonstrate a basic understanding of safety principles and provides local licensing authorities with relevant mental health information.
District attorneys would be able to prosecute people who shoot at or near homes, which also seeks to ensure people subject to restraining orders no longer have access to guns.
The new law also expands the definition of “assault weapons” to include known assault weapons and other weapons that function like them. It bans the possession, transfer or sale of assault-style firearms or large-capacity feeding devices.
The law also bans issuing a license to carry a machine gun except for firearms instructors and bona fide collectors, and criminalizes possessing parts that are intended to make weapons more lethal by adding them to the machine gun statute. Such parts include bump stocks and rapid-fire trigger activators.
The Supreme Court this summer struck down a federal Trump-era ban on bump stocks.
veryGood! (56)
Related
- NCAA hits former Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh with suspension, show-cause for recruiting violations
- How removing 4 dams will return salmon to the Klamath River and the river to the people
- Authorities in Arizona identify victim of 1976 homicide, ask for help finding family, info
- Search resuming for missing Alaska woman who disappeared under frozen river ice while trying to save dog
- The GOP and Kansas’ Democratic governor ousted targeted lawmakers in the state’s primary
- Amy Robach and T.J. Holmes Detail Fight That Made Them Seek Relationship Counseling
- NFL power rankings Week 17: Ravens overtake top spot after rolling 49ers
- NFL MVP race turned on its head as Brock Purdy implodes, Lamar Jackson rises in Ravens' rout
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Feds want to hunt one kind of owl to save another kind of owl. Here's why.
Ranking
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- As migration surges, immigration court case backlog swells to over 3 million
- A Greek police officer shot with a flare during an attack by sports fans has died in a hospital
- Actor Lee Sun-kyun of Oscar-winning film 'Parasite' is found dead in Seoul
- British swimmer Adam Peaty: There are worms in the food at Paris Olympic Village
- The Baltimore Ravens thrive on disrespect. It's their rocket fuel. This is why it works.
- Is there any recourse for a poor job review with no prior feedback? Ask HR
- Russian presidential hopeful loses appeal against authorities’ refusal to register her for the race
Recommendation
Matt Damon remembers pal Robin Williams: 'He was a very deep, deep river'
Anthropologie's End-of Season Sale is Here: Save an Extra 40% off on Must-Have Fashion, Home & More
Kansas spent more than $10M on outside legal fees defending NCAA infractions case
Offshore wind in the U.S. hit headwinds in 2023. Here's what you need to know
New Orleans mayor’s former bodyguard making first court appearance after July indictment
Beyoncé’s Childhood Home Catches Fire on Christmas
Madewell's Post-Holiday Sale Goes Big with $9 Tops, $41 Jeans, $39 Boots & More
China sanctions a US research firm and 2 individuals over reports on human rights abuses in Xinjiang