Current:Home > NewsJustice Department formally moves to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug in historic shift -Elevate Capital Network
Justice Department formally moves to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug in historic shift
View
Date:2025-04-12 07:23:36
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department on Thursday formally moved to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug in a historic shift in generations of U.S. drug policy.
A proposed rule sent to the federal register recognizes the medical uses of cannabis and acknowledges it has less potential for abuse than some of the nation’s most dangerous drugs. The plan approved by Attorney General Merrick Garland does not legalize marijuana outright for recreational use.
The Drug Enforcement Administration will take public comment on the proposal to move marijuana away from its current classification as a Schedule I drug, alongside heroin and LSD. It moves pot to Schedule III, alongside ketamine and some anabolic steroids.
The move comes after a recommendation from the federal Health and Human Services Department, which launched a review of the drug’s status at the urging of President Joe Biden in 2022.
Biden also has moved to pardon thousands of people convicted federally of simple possession of marijuana and has called on governors and local leaders to take similar steps to erase convictions.
“This is monumental,” Biden said in a video statement, calling it an important move toward reversing longstanding inequities. “Far too many lives have been upended because of a failed approach to marijuana, and I’m committed to righting those wrongs. You have my word on it.”
The election year announcement could help Biden, a Democrat, boost flagging support, particularly among younger voters.
The notice of proposed rulemaking submitted to the federal register kicks off a 60-day comment period followed by a possible review from an administrative judge, a potentially lengthy process.
Biden and a growing number of lawmakers from both major political parties have been pushing for the DEA decision as marijuana has become increasingly decriminalized and accepted, particularly by younger people.
The U.S. Cannabis Council, a trade group, applauded the proposed change, saying it would “signal a tectonic shift away from the failed policies of the last 50 years.”
The available data reviewed by HHS shows that while marijuana “is associated with a high prevalence of abuse,” that potential is more in line with other schedule III substances, according to the proposed rule.
The HHS recommendations are binding until the draft rule is submitted, and Garland agreed with it for the purposes of starting the process.
Still, the DEA has not yet formed its own determination as to where marijuana should be scheduled, and it expects to learn more during the rulemaking process, the document states.
Schedule III drugs are still controlled substances and subject to rules and regulations, and people who traffic in them without permission could still face federal criminal prosecution.
Some critics argue the DEA shouldn’t change course on marijuana, saying rescheduling isn’t necessary and could lead to harmful side effects. Others argue marijuana should be treated the way alcohol is.
Federal drug policy has lagged behind many states in recent years, with 38 states having already legalized medical marijuana and 24 legalizing its recreational use. That’s helped fuel fast growth in the marijuana industry, with an estimated worth of nearly $30 billion.
Easing federal regulations could reduce the tax burden that can be 70% or more for marijuana businesses, according to industry groups. It also could make it easier to research marijuana, since it’s very difficult to conduct authorized clinical studies on Schedule I substances.
___
Associated Press writers Zeke Miller in Washington and Joshua Goodman in Miami contributed to this report.
___
Follow the AP’s coverage of marijuana at https://apnews.com/hub/marijuana.
veryGood! (11812)
Related
- Jury selection set for Monday for ex-politician accused of killing Las Vegas investigative reporter
- Pennsylvania House passes legislation to complete overdue budget. Decisions now lie with the Senate
- Report of fatal New Jersey car crash fills in key gap in Menendez federal bribery investigation
- Tom Holland and Zendaya’s Latest Photos Are Paw-sitively Adorable
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Wisconsin Republicans want to make it a crime to be naked in public
- Joan Baez at peace
- FedEx 757 with landing gear failure crash lands, skids off runway in Chattanooga
- NCAA hits former Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh with suspension, show-cause for recruiting violations
- Geri Halliwell Reveals Why She Ditched Her Eccentric Spice Girl Style
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- These major cities have experienced the highest temperature increases in recent years
- Armed man sought Wisconsin governor at Capitol. After arrest he returned with loaded rifle
- FTX co-founder testifies against Sam Bankman-Fried, saying they committed crimes and lied to public
- The seven biggest college football quarterback competitions include Michigan, Ohio State
- Court dismisses $224 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson in talcum power lawsuit
- When is the next Powerball drawing? Jackpot soars to $1.4 billion, 3rd largest in history
- Rep. George Santos’ former campaign treasurer will plead guilty to a federal felony, prosecutors say
Recommendation
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
Why Suki Waterhouse Took a Bout of Celibacy Before Dating Robert Pattinson
Garth Brooks, Trisha Yearwood talk working with the Carters for Habitat for Humanity and new music
Joan Baez at peace
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Josh Duhamel says Hollywood lifestyle played a role in his split with ex-wife Fergie
The communities experimenting with how to be more resilient to a changing climate
We need to talk about the macro effect of microaggressions on women at work